In short
A strong teacher selection criteria response answers the criterion directly, then proves it with one specific example in STAR form: the situation, your task, the actions you took and a measurable result for students. Panels look for evidence linked to the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. Paste a criterion and your draft to get a score and a sharper rewrite.
How to use the ai selection criteria coach
- 1
Paste the criterion
Copy the exact wording from the job ad or role description, whether it's a NSW targeted selection criterion, a Victorian key selection criterion or a WA statement of claims.
- 2
Paste your draft response
Add what you've written so far. Rough notes are fine; the coach works best when it can see your real example.
- 3
Add the context
Tell it the role (graduate, experienced, leadership or casual) and any word limit in the ad.
- 4
Read the feedback and rewrite
You'll get a panel-style score, the specific gaps, the Standards your answer should be evidencing and a STAR rewrite in your own voice, within the word limit.
What selection panels are looking for
Government and many non-government schools in Australia hire on merit. A panel reads every application against the same criteria and shortlists the applicants whose evidence best matches them. That means a response is judged on evidence, not enthusiasm. A panel member should be able to tick the criterion off after reading your first two sentences, then see proof in the example that follows.
The language changes between systems. NSW uses targeted selection criteria, Victoria uses key selection criteria (KSC) and WA asks for a statement of claims. The principle is the same: show what you did, how you did it and what changed for students. See our guides to NSW targeted selection criteria and key selection criteria for Victorian teachers.
The STAR structure, and how the coach uses it
The shape of a strong STAR response
- Opening sentence
- Answer the criterion in one line, using its key words
- Situation
- The class, year level or context, in one sentence
- Task
- What you needed to achieve, and why it mattered
- Action
- The specific steps you took, most of the response
- Result
- What changed for students, with evidence such as assessment data or work samples
This is the structure the coach checks for. It doesn't invent examples: the best rewrites come from your own real experience.
The coach scores your response against what a merit panel looks for: a direct answer, a specific example, your own actions (not your team's), a result for students and clear links to the Standards. It then shows you which part is weakest and rewrites the response using your example.
Linking to the Australian Professional Standards
The Australian Professional Standards for Teachers have 7 standards in 3 domains (Professional Knowledge, Professional Practice and Professional Engagement), across 4 career stages: Graduate, Proficient, Highly Accomplished and Lead. Panels often expect your evidence to match the career stage of the role. A graduate's response can draw on practicum; a Proficient teacher's should show sustained classroom practice.
- Know students and how they learn and know the content and how to teach it (Professional Knowledge).
- Plan for and implement effective teaching, create supportive and safe learning environments and assess, give feedback and report (Professional Practice).
- Engage in professional learning and engage professionally with colleagues, parents and the community (Professional Engagement).
Other quick fixes the coach looks for
- Your first sentence answers the criterion using its own words
- You've used "I", not "we", for the actions that were yours
- There's one main example, not three thin ones
- The result includes evidence: data, work samples, feedback or observation
- You've stayed within the word or page limit in the ad
- Jargon and acronyms are spelled out the first time
Free review and full access
Your first review is free. After that, you can buy six months of unlimited reviews or get everything with Pro. The coach gives general feedback on your writing; it can't know a particular panel's priorities, so read the role description and talk to the school contact if you can. Your draft is used to generate your feedback.
Read selection criteria for teachers for worked examples, and practise the interview that follows with the AI teacher interview coach.
Frequently asked questions
How do I write teacher selection criteria?
What is the STAR method for selection criteria?
What are targeted selection criteria in NSW?
How long should a selection criteria response be?
Should I mention the teaching standards in selection criteria?
Is the AI selection criteria coach free?
Will the AI write my selection criteria for me?
Guides that go with this tool
Applications
Teacher selection criteria: how to answer them, with worked STAR examples
The method panels reward, the length rules by state, and four complete example responses you can adapt.
NSW applications
NSW targeted selection criteria: the half-page rule, how panels judge you, and two worked examples
The NSW Department's page limits and format, how merit selection panels work, and two half-page example responses.
VIC applications
Key selection criteria for Victorian teachers: format, panel rules and example responses
School Jobs Vic application rules, how Victorian panels assess you, and worked KSC responses you can adapt.