Skip to content

HALT

HALT evidence examples: artefacts and annotations for every Standard

Fictional HALT evidence examples for 2026: strong artefacts for all 7 Standards, sample annotations at Highly Accomplished and Lead, and a rewrite.

✓ By the TeacherPay AU Editorial Team · fact-checked against official sources Updated 17 October 2026 7 min read
On this page (10 sections)
  1. What assessors want to see
  2. Strong artefacts for each Standard
  3. Example annotation: Standard 1 (Highly Accomplished)
  4. Example annotation: Standard 4 (Highly Accomplished)
  5. Example annotation: Standard 5 (Lead)
  6. Example annotation: Standards 6 and 7
  7. Weak vs strong: rewriting an annotation
  8. How much to write, and how many artefacts
  9. What HALT is worth when you get there
  10. FAQs

The short answer

Good HALT evidence is an artefact plus an annotation that shows impact. The artefact proves the work happened; the annotation explains why you did it, what changed for students or colleagues, and how you know. The NT guide suggests about 150 words per descriptor and up to 35 artefacts. Highly Accomplished shows impact on colleagues; Lead, across the school.

  • Assessors look for impact, not activity.
  • One artefact can cover two to four descriptors if the annotation links them.
  • Referees can verify up to 15 descriptors in the NT, cutting the artefacts you need.
  • Every annotation on this page is a fictional example.

What assessors want to see

HALT is assessed against the Highly Accomplished (x.x.3) or Lead (x.x.4) descriptors of the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers: 7 Standards and 37 focus areas. An artefact alone doesn't meet a descriptor. The annotation has to connect what you did to the descriptor's language and show results. If you haven't yet checked whether you can apply, start with the HALT eligibility checker; for the stage-by-stage process, fees and timelines, see the HALT application process.

Highly Accomplished (x.x.3)

  • Highly effective in your own classroom
  • Works with and supports colleagues to improve
  • Evidence: your students' results plus colleagues you mentored, modelled for or co-planned with
  • Scope: your team, faculty or stage

Lead (x.x.4)

  • Leads initiatives that change practice across the school
  • Evaluates programs and builds others' capacity
  • Evidence: whole-school data, policies you led, professional learning you designed
  • Scope: school-wide, network or system; plus a Lead initiative statement

Free calculator

HALT eligibility checker

Check your registration, years of service and state rules before you start building evidence.

Check my eligibility
Test your HALT evidence Check an annotation against the descriptor and get a sharper rewrite. Your first review is free.

Strong artefacts for each Standard

Artefact ideas by Standard (adapt to your context)
StandardStrong artefactsWeak artefacts
1. Know students and how they learnClass profile with adjustments and outcomes; learning support plans you co-wrote with resultsA generic class list; a photo of a classroom
2. Know the content and how to teach itScope and sequence you redesigned; literacy or numeracy strategy you led with dataA textbook chapter; a unit copied from a resource site
3. Plan for and implement effective teachingUnit plan with annotated revisions after evaluation; program review reportA single lesson plan with no evaluation
4. Safe and supportive learning environmentsBehaviour data before and after a routine you introduced; wellbeing program you ledSchool behaviour policy you didn't write
5. Assess, give feedback and reportItem analysis spreadsheet; moderation records; feedback samples and the resulting workA blank rubric; a marked test with no follow-up
6. Engage in professional learningObservation feedback you gave a colleague and their follow-up; PL you designed with evaluation dataA certificate of attendance
7. Engage professionally with colleagues, parents/carers and communityParent communication program with response data; partnership you set up; minutes showing your leadershipA newsletter item; an email with no context

Remove or blur every student and colleague name. Assessors need to verify, not identify, and referees can confirm the details.

Example annotation: Standard 1 (Highly Accomplished)

Worked example

Fictional annotation: 1.5.3 Differentiate teaching to meet specific learning needs

Artefact
Year 7 science unit plan with tiered tasks, plus pre/post test summary (Term 1)
Context
Two Year 7 classes (52 students): 9 EAL/D learners, 4 students with learning adjustments, a pre-test range of four year levels
What I did
Designed three entry points for each core task, with a vocabulary scaffold for EAL/D students; shared the template with the two other Year 7 science teachers and co-planned the next unit with them
Impact on students
Average post-test growth of 26 percentage points; 47 of 52 met the core outcome (up from 19 in the pre-test)
Impact on colleagues
Both colleagues used the template in Term 2; one reported her EAL/D students' completion rate rising from 5 of 8 to 8 of 8
Link to descriptor
Shows effective differentiation in my classes and that I support colleagues to differentiate theirs

Fictional example, about 150 words when written as prose. Your annotation must use your own data and be verifiable by a referee.

Example annotation: Standard 4 (Highly Accomplished)

Worked example

Fictional annotation: 4.2.3 Organise classroom activities and provide clear directions

Artefact
Lesson routine poster and observation record from a colleague's class (Term 3), plus behaviour referral data
Context
Year 5/6 composite; the stage team reported transitions losing up to 10 minutes a lesson
What I did
Introduced a four-step routine (entry task, explicit instruction, guided practice, exit) in my class; modelled it for two stage colleagues and observed them using it
Impact on students
In my class, referrals fell from 14 in Term 2 to 5 in Term 3; average on-task time in observed lessons rose from 70% to 88%
Impact on colleagues
Both colleagues adopted the routine; the stage now uses it as its common lesson structure

Fictional example to show structure.

Example annotation: Standard 5 (Lead)

Worked example

Fictional annotation: 5.4.4 Co-ordinate student performance and program evaluation using internal and external data

Artefact
Whole-school data review presentation and the revised assessment schedule it produced (2026)
Context
K-6 school of about 450; reading results below similar schools for three years
What I led
Set up a termly data cycle across all stages, combining phonics screening, reading benchmarks and external test results; trained stage leaders to run it
Program evaluation
Used the data to replace two intervention programs that showed no growth with an explicit phonics sequence
Impact
Students meeting the Year 1 phonics benchmark rose from 54% to 79% over two years; all four stage leaders now run the cycle without me

Fictional example. Lead annotations must show school-wide leadership and evaluation, not just your own classes.

Example annotation: Standards 6 and 7

Worked example

Fictional annotation: 6.3.3 Engage with colleagues and improve practice

Artefact
Peer observation schedule and two feedback records (names removed)
What I did
Set up fortnightly peer observations for three early-career teachers focused on questioning; gave written feedback against one agreed goal each
Impact
Two of the three achieved Proficient accreditation that year; their observed use of higher-order questions roughly doubled across the term

Fictional example.

Worked example

Fictional annotation: 7.3.3 Engage with parents/carers

Artefact
Term overview template and parent survey results
What I did
Designed a one-page term learning overview with home-practice ideas for Year 3 families; the Year 3 team adopted it for all four classes
Impact
Parent survey 'I know what my child is learning' agreement rose from 61% to 86%; reading log returns rose from about half to three quarters

Fictional example.

Weak vs strong: rewriting an annotation

The strong version is evidence for 3.2.3, 5.4.3 and 6.3.3 at once.

Weak (fictional)

  • 'This is my Year 10 unit plan. I use lots of strategies to engage students.'
  • 'I shared it with my faculty and they found it useful.'
  • 'Students enjoyed the unit and did well.'
  • Describes activity; no data; no link to the descriptor

Strong (fictional)

  • 'I redesigned the Year 10 persuasive writing unit after the 2025 results showed 40% of students below standard on argument structure.'
  • 'I co-planned the revised unit with four colleagues and modelled the first lesson in two of their classes.'
  • 'Students at or above standard rose from 60% to 78% across five classes.'
  • Names the problem, the action, the colleagues and the measured result

How much to write, and how many artefacts

Evidence limits by authority (from our HALT process research)
AuthorityEvidence formatLength guide
TRB NT (national framework)Up to 35 annotated artefacts, at least 2 observation reports; 2-page written statement (plus a Lead initiative statement for Lead)About 150 words per descriptor, 350 per multi-descriptor artefact, 600 per evidence set
NESA (NSW)Module 1 and Module 2, each up to 5 evidence sets covering 2 to 4 descriptors; 20 descriptors in total, 14 mandatedAbout 700 words of structured narrative per set
Referees (NT)3 to 5, one your principal or delegateEach verified descriptor reduces the artefacts required: 0 verified leaves 35, 11 to 15 verified leaves 25

Other certifying authorities follow the national framework with their own guides. Check yours before you start.

Free calculator

AI HALT Evidence Planner

Paste a draft annotation and the descriptor. Get feedback on impact, evidence and descriptor language, plus a gap map across all 37 focus areas.

Plan my evidence

What HALT is worth when you get there

HALT pay in government schools (current rates)
StateHighly AccomplishedLeadFrom
NSW$141,997 (both levels; $8,575 above Step 7)$141,9979 Oct 2026
QLD$134,694$147,0507 Sep 2026 (interim)
SA$133,736$141,3658 May 2026
ACTExtra increment, or +$7,495 a year at TL8Same4 Dec 2025
NT+$13,938 a year allowance+$29,184 a year allowanceJan 2026

VIC, WA and TAS don't have HALT pay steps in their government scales; their expert-teacher routes are Learning Specialist, Level 3 Classroom Teacher and Advanced Skills Teacher. See teacher pay progression by state.

HALT pays off fastest where it's a salary step at the top of the scale. If you're still climbing, see how long it takes to reach the top of the pay scale in your state, and the HALT pay guide for after-tax figures.

Frequently asked questions

What counts as evidence for HALT?
Artefacts that show your practice and its impact, such as data analysis, unit plans with evaluation, observation reports, professional learning you designed, and meeting minutes, each with an annotation linking it to the Highly Accomplished or Lead descriptors.
How long should a HALT annotation be?
The NT guide suggests about 150 words per descriptor, 350 words for an artefact covering several descriptors, and 600 words for an evidence set. In NSW, each evidence set has a structured narrative of about 700 words.
How many artefacts do I need for HALT?
Under the NT guide, up to 35, reduced if referees verify descriptors: 33 with 1 to 5 verified, 29 with 6 to 10, and 25 with 11 to 15. NSW uses evidence sets instead, up to five per module.
What is the difference between Highly Accomplished and Lead evidence?
Highly Accomplished evidence shows you're highly effective in your own classroom and support colleagues. Lead evidence shows you lead initiatives and evaluate programs that change practice across the school or beyond.
Can one artefact cover several descriptors?
Yes. A single artefact, such as a data review, can evidence two to four descriptors if the annotation explains how it meets each one.
Are these HALT annotations real?
No. Every example on this page is fictional, written to show structure and level. Your evidence must be your own and verifiable by your referees.
Should I remove student names from HALT artefacts?
Yes. De-identify students, colleagues and families in every artefact. Referees and assessors can verify the work without names.

Sources we checked · last verified 2026-10-17

  1. 1.AITSL: Understand certification and HALT status
  2. 2.AITSL: Australian Professional Standards for Teachers
  3. 3.TRB NT: Guide to Certification of Highly Accomplished and Lead Teachers (PDF)
  4. 4.NESA: Develop your evidence (HALT)
  5. 5.NSW Teachers Salaries and Conditions Award 2024
  6. 6.SA School and Preschool Education Staff Enterprise Agreement 2024
  7. 7.NT Public Sector Educators' 2024-2027 Enterprise Agreement
  8. 8.QLD DoE salary schedule

About this page

Written and fact-checked by the TeacherPay AU Editorial Team against the enterprise agreements, awards and official pages listed in the sources. It is general information, not personal financial, tax or legal advice. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll fix it, usually within a day. See our editorial policy and how we calculate.

Keep reading