On this page (10 sections)
- What assessors want to see
- Strong artefacts for each Standard
- Example annotation: Standard 1 (Highly Accomplished)
- Example annotation: Standard 4 (Highly Accomplished)
- Example annotation: Standard 5 (Lead)
- Example annotation: Standards 6 and 7
- Weak vs strong: rewriting an annotation
- How much to write, and how many artefacts
- What HALT is worth when you get there
- FAQs
The short answer
Good HALT evidence is an artefact plus an annotation that shows impact. The artefact proves the work happened; the annotation explains why you did it, what changed for students or colleagues, and how you know. The NT guide suggests about 150 words per descriptor and up to 35 artefacts. Highly Accomplished shows impact on colleagues; Lead, across the school.
- Assessors look for impact, not activity.
- One artefact can cover two to four descriptors if the annotation links them.
- Referees can verify up to 15 descriptors in the NT, cutting the artefacts you need.
- Every annotation on this page is a fictional example.
What assessors want to see
HALT is assessed against the Highly Accomplished (x.x.3) or Lead (x.x.4) descriptors of the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers: 7 Standards and 37 focus areas. An artefact alone doesn't meet a descriptor. The annotation has to connect what you did to the descriptor's language and show results. If you haven't yet checked whether you can apply, start with the HALT eligibility checker; for the stage-by-stage process, fees and timelines, see the HALT application process.
Highly Accomplished (x.x.3)
- Highly effective in your own classroom
- Works with and supports colleagues to improve
- Evidence: your students' results plus colleagues you mentored, modelled for or co-planned with
- Scope: your team, faculty or stage
Lead (x.x.4)
- Leads initiatives that change practice across the school
- Evaluates programs and builds others' capacity
- Evidence: whole-school data, policies you led, professional learning you designed
- Scope: school-wide, network or system; plus a Lead initiative statement
Free calculator
HALT eligibility checker
Check your registration, years of service and state rules before you start building evidence.
Check my eligibilityStrong artefacts for each Standard
Remove or blur every student and colleague name. Assessors need to verify, not identify, and referees can confirm the details.
Example annotation: Standard 1 (Highly Accomplished)
Fictional annotation: 1.5.3 Differentiate teaching to meet specific learning needs
- Artefact
- Year 7 science unit plan with tiered tasks, plus pre/post test summary (Term 1)
- Context
- Two Year 7 classes (52 students): 9 EAL/D learners, 4 students with learning adjustments, a pre-test range of four year levels
- What I did
- Designed three entry points for each core task, with a vocabulary scaffold for EAL/D students; shared the template with the two other Year 7 science teachers and co-planned the next unit with them
- Impact on students
- Average post-test growth of 26 percentage points; 47 of 52 met the core outcome (up from 19 in the pre-test)
- Impact on colleagues
- Both colleagues used the template in Term 2; one reported her EAL/D students' completion rate rising from 5 of 8 to 8 of 8
- Link to descriptor
- Shows effective differentiation in my classes and that I support colleagues to differentiate theirs
Fictional example, about 150 words when written as prose. Your annotation must use your own data and be verifiable by a referee.
Example annotation: Standard 4 (Highly Accomplished)
Fictional annotation: 4.2.3 Organise classroom activities and provide clear directions
- Artefact
- Lesson routine poster and observation record from a colleague's class (Term 3), plus behaviour referral data
- Context
- Year 5/6 composite; the stage team reported transitions losing up to 10 minutes a lesson
- What I did
- Introduced a four-step routine (entry task, explicit instruction, guided practice, exit) in my class; modelled it for two stage colleagues and observed them using it
- Impact on students
- In my class, referrals fell from 14 in Term 2 to 5 in Term 3; average on-task time in observed lessons rose from 70% to 88%
- Impact on colleagues
- Both colleagues adopted the routine; the stage now uses it as its common lesson structure
Fictional example to show structure.
Example annotation: Standard 5 (Lead)
Fictional annotation: 5.4.4 Co-ordinate student performance and program evaluation using internal and external data
- Artefact
- Whole-school data review presentation and the revised assessment schedule it produced (2026)
- Context
- K-6 school of about 450; reading results below similar schools for three years
- What I led
- Set up a termly data cycle across all stages, combining phonics screening, reading benchmarks and external test results; trained stage leaders to run it
- Program evaluation
- Used the data to replace two intervention programs that showed no growth with an explicit phonics sequence
- Impact
- Students meeting the Year 1 phonics benchmark rose from 54% to 79% over two years; all four stage leaders now run the cycle without me
Fictional example. Lead annotations must show school-wide leadership and evaluation, not just your own classes.
Example annotation: Standards 6 and 7
Fictional annotation: 6.3.3 Engage with colleagues and improve practice
- Artefact
- Peer observation schedule and two feedback records (names removed)
- What I did
- Set up fortnightly peer observations for three early-career teachers focused on questioning; gave written feedback against one agreed goal each
- Impact
- Two of the three achieved Proficient accreditation that year; their observed use of higher-order questions roughly doubled across the term
Fictional example.
Fictional annotation: 7.3.3 Engage with parents/carers
- Artefact
- Term overview template and parent survey results
- What I did
- Designed a one-page term learning overview with home-practice ideas for Year 3 families; the Year 3 team adopted it for all four classes
- Impact
- Parent survey 'I know what my child is learning' agreement rose from 61% to 86%; reading log returns rose from about half to three quarters
Fictional example.
Weak vs strong: rewriting an annotation
The strong version is evidence for 3.2.3, 5.4.3 and 6.3.3 at once.
Weak (fictional)
- 'This is my Year 10 unit plan. I use lots of strategies to engage students.'
- 'I shared it with my faculty and they found it useful.'
- 'Students enjoyed the unit and did well.'
- Describes activity; no data; no link to the descriptor
Strong (fictional)
- 'I redesigned the Year 10 persuasive writing unit after the 2025 results showed 40% of students below standard on argument structure.'
- 'I co-planned the revised unit with four colleagues and modelled the first lesson in two of their classes.'
- 'Students at or above standard rose from 60% to 78% across five classes.'
- Names the problem, the action, the colleagues and the measured result
How much to write, and how many artefacts
Other certifying authorities follow the national framework with their own guides. Check yours before you start.
Free calculator
AI HALT Evidence Planner
Paste a draft annotation and the descriptor. Get feedback on impact, evidence and descriptor language, plus a gap map across all 37 focus areas.
Plan my evidenceWhat HALT is worth when you get there
VIC, WA and TAS don't have HALT pay steps in their government scales; their expert-teacher routes are Learning Specialist, Level 3 Classroom Teacher and Advanced Skills Teacher. See teacher pay progression by state.
HALT pays off fastest where it's a salary step at the top of the scale. If you're still climbing, see how long it takes to reach the top of the pay scale in your state, and the HALT pay guide for after-tax figures.
Frequently asked questions
What counts as evidence for HALT?
How long should a HALT annotation be?
How many artefacts do I need for HALT?
What is the difference between Highly Accomplished and Lead evidence?
Can one artefact cover several descriptors?
Are these HALT annotations real?
Should I remove student names from HALT artefacts?
Sources we checked · last verified 2026-10-17
- 1.AITSL: Understand certification and HALT status
- 2.AITSL: Australian Professional Standards for Teachers
- 3.TRB NT: Guide to Certification of Highly Accomplished and Lead Teachers (PDF)
- 4.NESA: Develop your evidence (HALT)
- 5.NSW Teachers Salaries and Conditions Award 2024
- 6.SA School and Preschool Education Staff Enterprise Agreement 2024
- 7.NT Public Sector Educators' 2024-2027 Enterprise Agreement
- 8.QLD DoE salary schedule
About this page
Written and fact-checked by the TeacherPay AU Editorial Team against the enterprise agreements, awards and official pages listed in the sources. It is general information, not personal financial, tax or legal advice. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll fix it, usually within a day. See our editorial policy and how we calculate.
Keep reading
HALT
The HALT certification process, step by step: evidence, annotations, site visit and timelines
The two-stage HALT assessment explained, with NSW and NT evidence rules, fees and a realistic timeline.
HALT
Highly Accomplished and Lead Teacher (HALT): what it is, what it pays and whether to go for it
What HALT certification is, how it differs from Proficient, and what it is worth in each state's pay scale.
Applications
Teacher referee reports: what panels ask, how to brief referees and how to write one
Who to pick as a referee, what panels ask them in each state, a briefing template, and fictional prompts for writing a referee report.
Pay progression
Teacher pay increments by state: how often you move up and what each step is worth
When increments happen in each state, what conditions apply, and the dollar value of every step on the classroom scale.
Career
How long does it take to reach the top of the teacher pay scale in each state?
Years from graduate step to the top of the classroom scale in all eight systems, what slows or speeds you up, and what's above the top.